CH2 Worked Problems
Welcome to my CH2 Worked Problems page! This is a living, breathing work-in-progress, so you may spot rough edges or the occasional slip—if you do, please let me know so I can fix it. Before peeking at any solutions, I strongly encourage you to try each problem yourself first; you’ll learn far more from the struggle than the spoiler. To jump around quickly, use the Quick Links box right below this intro.
P2.1
Twelve equal charges, q, are situated at the corners of a regular 12-sided polygon (think analog clock) with the test charge Q at the center. What is the net force on the test charge?
Answer: The net force will be zero, because for every charge acting on the test charge there is another charge that cancels that force out.
Suppose one of the 12 q's is removed (the one at "6 o'clock"). What is the Force on Q? Explain.
Answer: A force will develope on the Test charge pointing in the direction of 6 o'clock.
Because the full 12-charge sum is zero, removing the 6 o’clock charge gives
\[ \sum_{i=1}^{12}\mathbf{E}_i=\mathbf{0} \;\Rightarrow\; \sum_{i\neq 6}\mathbf{E}_i = -\,\mathbf{E}_{6} \;\equiv\; \mathbf{E}_{\text{net}}. \]Thus the net field (and force on \(Q\)) points toward the gap, i.e., toward 6 o’clock.
Now 13 eqaul charges, q, are placed at the corners of a regular 13-sided polygon. What is the force on a test charge Q at the center?
Answer: The resulting net force is 0, justfied by hte Theorem below.
Theorem
The vector sum of N equal-length vectors evenly spaced around a circle is 0.1) Rotation-invariance proof (fully explicit)
Let the vectors be v0, …, vN−1 with equal length and directions spaced by θ = 2π/N. Define their sum S = Σk=0N−1 vk. Let Rθ be the rotation by θ with matrix
cos θ −sin θ sin θ cos θ Rotating every vector by θ just relabels them (cycles indices), so RθS = S. Hence
( Rθ − I ) S = 0.Compute
det( Rθ − I ) = (cos θ − 1)2 + sin2θ = 2(1 − cos θ) = 4 sin2(θ/2).For N ≥ 2, θ = 2π/N ≠ 0, so sin(θ/2) ≠ 0 and det( Rθ − I ) ≠ 0. Therefore the only solution of ( Rθ − I )S = 0 is
S = 0.If one of the 13 q's is removed, what is the force on test charge Q? Explain your reasoning?
Answer:
Place equal charges q at the vertices of a regular 13-gon of circumradius R. By symmetry, with all 13 present the field at the center is zero:
Σi=113 Ei(center) = 0.Remove one charge (call it m). The remaining field equals the negative of the missing charge’s contribution:
Enet = Σi≠m Ei = − Em.A single point charge q at distance R produces
Em = (k q)/(R2) r̂m→c, k = 1/(4π ε0).where r̂m→c is the unit vector from the missing vertex m toward the center. Therefore
Enet = (k q)/(R2) û with û = − r̂m→c (i.e., from center toward the missing vertex).The force on a test charge Q at the center is
F = Q Enet = (k q Q)/(R2) û.Direction: for q > 0 the force on Q > 0 points toward the missing corner; for q < 0 it points away (direction reverses with the sign of q or Q).
Geometry: R is the distance from center to each vertex (circumradius).
P2.2
Find the electric field (magnitude and direction) a distance z above the midpoint between equal and opposite charges (±q), a distance d apart, except that the charge at x = +d/2 is negative.
Answer:
Field at P(0, Z) from ±q (2-D; ignore y) — Superposition, no k-substitution
Geometry. Place +q at x = −D/2 and −q at x = +D/2. Test point: P = (0, Z). Basis: î along x, k̂ along z.
Common distance and angles.
R = √((D/2)2 + Z2), cos θ = (D/2)/R, sin θ = Z/R.1) Field from the negative charge (at x = +D/2)
Magnitude: E0 = (1 / (4π ε0)) · (q / R2). Direction at P is toward the negative charge, giving
Eq− = E0(cos θ î − sin θ k̂) = (1/(4πε0)) (q/R2) ((D/(2R)) î − (Z/R) k̂) = (1/(4πε0)) (q/R3) ((D/2) î − Z k̂).2) Field from the positive charge (at x = −D/2)
Magnitude: E0 = (1 / (4π ε0)) · (q / R2). Direction at P is away from the positive charge, giving
Eq+ = E0(cos θ î + sin θ k̂) = (1/(4πε0)) (q/R2) ((D/(2R)) î + (Z/R) k̂) = (1/(4πε0)) (q/R3) ((D/2) î + Z k̂).3) Superpose
E = Eq− + Eq+ = (1/(4πε0)) (q/R3) [ (D/2 + D/2) î + (−Z + Z) k̂ ].E(0, Z) = (1/(4πε0)) (q D) / ( Z2 + (D/2)2 )3/2 î.The field points along +î (toward the negative charge).
P2.3
Find the electric field a distance z above one end of a straight line segment of length L, that carries a uniform line charge λ. Check that your formul is consistent with what you would expect for case z >> L.
Answer:
Worked Solution: E at P a distance z above one end of a segment (length L, density λ)
Setup: Place the segment on the x-axis from x = 0 to x = L. Let the observation point be P = (0, z) with z > 0. Line charge density is constant, λ.
-
Geometry & Coulomb’s law.
A charge element at x has dq = λ dx. The vector from dq to P is
\(\vec r = (-x)\,\hat{\mathbf i} + z\,\hat{\mathbf k}\) with magnitude \(r=\sqrt{x^2+z^2}\).
\[ d\vec E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{dq}{r^2}\,\hat{\mathbf r} = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{\vec r}{r^{3}}\,dx = \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{-x\,\hat{\mathbf i}+z\,\hat{\mathbf k}}{(x^2+z^2)^{3/2}}\,dx. \]
-
Component integrals.
\[ E_x=\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int_{0}^{L}\frac{-x}{(x^2+z^2)^{3/2}}\,dx, \qquad E_z=\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int_{0}^{L}\frac{z}{(x^2+z^2)^{3/2}}\,dx. \]
-
Evaluate \(E_z\). Use the standard result
\(\displaystyle \int \frac{dx}{(x^2+a^2)^{3/2}}=\frac{x}{a^2\sqrt{x^2+a^2}}+C\) with \(a=z\):
\[ E_z=\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,z\left[\frac{x}{z^2\sqrt{x^2+z^2}}\right]_{0}^{L} =\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{L}{z\sqrt{L^2+z^2}}. \]Direction: \(E_z>0\) (points \(+\hat{\mathbf k}\)) for \(\lambda>0\).
-
Evaluate \(E_x\). Let \(u=x^2+z^2\Rightarrow du=2x\,dx\):
\[ \int \frac{-x}{(x^2+z^2)^{3/2}}\,dx = -\tfrac12\int u^{-3/2}\,du = -\tfrac12\left(\frac{u^{-1/2}}{-\tfrac12}\right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{u}}+C = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+z^2}}+C. \] \[ \Rightarrow\quad E_x=\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+z^2}}\right]_{0}^{L} =\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\!\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{L^2+z^2}}-\frac{1}{z}\right). \]Since \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{L^2+z^2}}<\frac{1}{z}\), we have \(E_x<0\): the field points toward \(-\hat{\mathbf i}\) for \(\lambda>0\).
-
Assemble the vector field.
\[ \boxed{ \vec E(P)= \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\!\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{L^2+z^2}}-\frac{1}{z}\right)\hat{\mathbf i} \;+\; \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{L}{z\sqrt{L^2+z^2}}\;\hat{\mathbf k} }. \]
-
Consistency check: far field \(z\gg L\).
Use \(\sqrt{L^2+z^2}\approx z\left(1+\tfrac{L^2}{2z^2}\right)\).
\[ E_x \approx \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\!\left(\frac{1}{z}\Big(1-\frac{L^2}{2z^2}\Big)-\frac{1}{z}\right) = -\,\frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{L^2}{2z^3}, \qquad E_z \approx \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{L}{z^2}. \]Leading term behaves like a point charge \(q=\lambda L\) at distance \(z\) (i.e., \(E\sim \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{q}{z^2}\,\hat{\mathbf k}\)), as expected.
Signs reverse if \(\lambda<0\). Units: \([\lambda]=\mathrm{C/m}\) gives \(\vec E\) in \(\mathrm{N/C}\).
-
Geometry & Coulomb’s law.
A charge element at x has dq = λ dx. The vector from dq to P is
\(\vec r = (-x)\,\hat{\mathbf i} + z\,\hat{\mathbf k}\) with magnitude \(r=\sqrt{x^2+z^2}\).
P2.6
Find the electric field a distance z above the center of a flat circular disk of radius R that carries a uniform surface charge. What does your formula give in the limit as R-> infinity? Also check the case r >> R.
Answer:
Electric field on the axis of a uniformly charged disk
Disk of radius R with uniform surface charge density σ lies in the x–y plane; point P is on the z-axis at height z above the center. By symmetry the field is along +\(\hat{\mathbf z}\) for σ > 0.
- Ring element. Take a ring of radius \(\rho\) and thickness \(d\rho\). The ring’s charge is \(dq=\sigma(2\pi\rho\,d\rho)\). The axial contribution is \[ dE_z=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{dq\,z}{(z^2+\rho^2)^{3/2}} =\frac{\sigma z}{2\varepsilon_0}\frac{\rho\,d\rho}{(z^2+\rho^2)^{3/2}}. \]
- Integrate \(\rho=0\to R\). \[ E_z=\frac{\sigma z}{2\varepsilon_0}\int_{0}^{R}\frac{\rho\,d\rho}{(z^2+\rho^2)^{3/2}} \quad \text{with } u=z^2+\rho^2 \Rightarrow du=2\rho\,d\rho. \] \[ E_z=\frac{\sigma z}{4\varepsilon_0}\int_{z^2}^{z^2+R^2}u^{-3/2}\,du =\frac{\sigma z}{4\varepsilon_0}\left[\frac{u^{-1/2}}{-\tfrac12}\right]_{z^2}^{z^2+R^2} =\frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\!\left(1-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}\right). \]
- Result (direction on axis): \[ \boxed{\,\vec E(P)=\frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\!\left(1-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}\right)\hat{\mathbf z}\,} \quad (\text{points }+\hat{\mathbf z}\text{ for }\sigma>0). \]
- Limit \(R\to\infty\): infinite plane. \[ \lim_{R\to\infty} \frac{z}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}=0 \;\;\Rightarrow\;\; \vec E \to \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\,\hat{\mathbf z}, \] the well-known constant field of an infinite charged plane (independent of \(z\)).
- Far field \(z\gg R\) (point-charge check). Using \(\sqrt{z^2+R^2}\approx z\big(1+\tfrac{R^2}{2z^2}\big)\), \[ E_z \approx \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\!\left(1- \frac{1}{1+\tfrac{R^2}{2z^2}}\right) \approx \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\!\left(\frac{R^2}{2z^2}\right) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{\sigma\pi R^2}{z^2}, \] i.e., the field of a point charge \(Q=\sigma\pi R^2\) at distance \(z\), as expected.
P2.15
Find the electric field inside a sphere that carries a charge density proportional to the distance from the center p = kr, for some constant k. [Caution: this charge density is not uniform, and you must integrate to get the enclosed charge.]
Answer:
Solution
Given a sphere of radius \(R\) with charge density \( \rho(r)=k\,r \) (so \(k\) has units C·m\(^{-4}\)). By spherical symmetry, the electric field inside must be radial and depend only on \(r\): \( \mathbf E(r)=E(r)\,\hat{\mathbf r}\).
- Choose a Gaussian surface. Take a concentric sphere of radius \(r\le R\). By symmetry, \(E(r)\) is constant over this surface and \(\mathbf E\parallel d\mathbf a\), so \[ \oint_{\mathcal S} \mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf a \;=\; E(r)\,\big(4\pi r^{2}\big). \]
- Compute the enclosed charge. \[ Q_{\text{enc}}(r)=\int_{0}^{r}\rho(r')\,4\pi r'^{2}\,dr' \;=\; 4\pi k\int_{0}^{r} r'^{3}\,dr' \;=\; 4\pi k\left(\frac{r^{4}}{4}\right) \;=\; \pi k r^{4}. \]
- Apply Gauss’s law. \[ \oint_{\mathcal S} \mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf a \;=\; \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}(r)}{\varepsilon_{0}} \quad\Rightarrow\quad E(r)\,\big(4\pi r^{2}\big) \;=\; \frac{\pi k r^{4}}{\varepsilon_{0}}. \] Solving for \(E(r)\), \[ E(r) \;=\; \frac{k}{4\,\varepsilon_{0}}\,r^{2}. \] Therefore, \[ \boxed{\;\mathbf E(r)\;=\;\frac{k}{4\,\varepsilon_{0}}\,r^{2}\,\hat{\mathbf r}\quad (0\le r\le R)\;} \] (direction is outward if \(k>0\)). At the center, \(E(0)=0\).
Optional check: field outside
Total charge in the sphere is \(Q_{\text{tot}}=\pi k R^{4}\). For \(r\ge R\), \[ E_{\text{out}}(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{Q_{\text{tot}}}{r^{2}} =\frac{k\,R^{4}}{4\,\varepsilon_{0}\,r^{2}}, \] which matches the inside value at \(r=R\): \(E_{\text{in}}(R)=\dfrac{kR^{2}}{4\varepsilon_{0}}\).
P2.17
A long coaxial cable carries a uniform volume charge density p on the inner cylinder (radius a), and a uniform surface charge density σ on the outer cylindrical shell (radius b). This surface charge is negative and is of just the right magnitude that the cable as a whole is electrically neutral. Find the electric field in each of the following three regions: (i) inside the inner cylinder (s < a), (ii) between the cylinders (a < s < b), (iii) outside the cable (s > b ). Plot the magnitude of E as a function of s.
Answer:
Coaxial cable: geometry & Gaussian surface
Plot of |E(s)| (normalized shape)
Solution — electric field in a neutral coax with inner volume charge
A very long coaxial cable has a solid inner cylinder of radius \(a\) carrying uniform volume charge density \(\rho\) (C·m\(^{-3}\)), and a thin outer cylindrical shell at radius \(b\) carrying surface charge density \(\sigma\) (C·m\(^{-2}\)). The total cable is neutral.
Neutrality condition
Charge per unit length on inner: \(\lambda_{\text{in}}=\rho\,\pi a^2\). On the outer shell: \(\lambda_{\text{out}}=\sigma\,(2\pi b)\). Neutral: \(\lambda_{\text{in}}+\lambda_{\text{out}}=0\Rightarrow\) \[ \boxed{\;\sigma = -\dfrac{\rho\,a^2}{2b}\;} \] (indeed negative if \(\rho>0\)).
Gauss’s law with cylindrical symmetry
Use a coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius \(s\) and length \(L\). By symmetry \(\mathbf E=E(s)\,\hat{\mathbf s}\) and \(\displaystyle \oint \mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf a = E(s)\,(2\pi sL)\).
- (i) Inside the inner cylinder, \(0\le s<a\). Enclosed charge per unit length: \(\lambda_{\text{enc}}(s)=\rho\,\pi s^2\). Gauss: \[ E(s)\,(2\pi sL)=\frac{\lambda_{\text{enc}}(s)\,L}{\varepsilon_0} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \boxed{\,E(s)=\dfrac{\rho}{2\varepsilon_0}\,s\,},\qquad (s<a). \] Direction is radially outward if \(\rho>0\).
- (ii) Between cylinders, \(a<s<b\). Enclosed is all inner charge: \(\lambda_{\text{enc}}=\rho\,\pi a^2\). \[ E(s)\,(2\pi sL)=\frac{\rho\,\pi a^2\,L}{\varepsilon_0} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \boxed{\,E(s)=\dfrac{\rho a^2}{2\varepsilon_0}\,\dfrac{1}{s}\,},\qquad (a<s<b). \]
- (iii) Outside the cable, \(s\ge b\). Both inner and outer charges are enclosed; neutrality makes the total per-unit-length zero: \[ \lambda_{\text{tot}}=\rho\,\pi a^2 + \sigma\,2\pi b=0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \boxed{\,E(s)=0\,},\qquad (s\ge b). \]
Checks
- Continuity at \(s=a\): \(E(a^-)=\dfrac{\rho a}{2\varepsilon_0}=E(a^+)\).
- Jump at the surface charge \(s=b\): normal component satisfies \(E(b^+)-E(b^-)=\sigma/\varepsilon_0\). Here \(E(b^+)=0\), so \(E(b^-)= -\sigma/\varepsilon_0 = \dfrac{\rho a^2}{2\varepsilon_0 b}\,>0\) for \(\rho>0\), matching the piecewise result.
Final piecewise field (magnitude)
\[ |E(s)| = \begin{cases} \dfrac{\rho}{2\varepsilon_0}\,s \quad \text{for } s\in[0,a),\\[6pt] \dfrac{\rho a^2}{2\varepsilon_0}\,\dfrac{1}{s} \quad \text{for } s\in(a,b),\\[6pt] 0 \quad \text{for } s\in[b,\infty). \end{cases} \]P2.19
Two spheres, each of radius R and carrying uniform volume charge densities +ρ and -ρ, respectively, are placed so that they partially overlap. Call the vector from the positive center to the negative center d. Show that the field in the region of overlap is constant, and find it's value.
Overlapping spheres: +ρ and −ρ, center-to-center vector d
Answer:
Solution — field in the overlap is constant
Let the centers be at position vectors R+ (sphere with +ρ) and R− (sphere with −ρ). Define the displacement d = R− − R+ (from the + center to the − center).
Field inside a uniformly charged solid sphere
For a point whose displacement from the center is r, the electric field (inside the solid) is linear:
Einside(r) = (ρ / (3 ε0)) rSuperposition in the overlap
Pick any point P in the lens-shaped overlap. Its displacements from the two centers are r+ = P − R+ and r− = P − R−. The fields (since P lies inside both solids) are
- from the +ρ sphere: E+(P) = (ρ / (3 ε0)) r+
- from the −ρ sphere: E−(P) = (−ρ / (3 ε0)) r−
Add them:
E(P) = (ρ / (3 ε0)) (r+ − r−) = (ρ / (3 ε0)) (R− − R+) = (ρ / (3 ε0)) d.Conclusion
The field in the overlap is uniform (independent of P) and points along d (from + to −):
E = (ρ / (3 ε0)) d, |E| = (ρ / (3 ε0)) |d|.Checks
- If the centers coincide (d = 0), the fields cancel: E = 0.
- Result is independent of the radius R; only the displacement d matters within the overlap.
P2.22
Find The potential inside and outside a uniformly charged solid sphere whose radius is R and whose total charge is q. Use infinity as your reference point. Compute the gradient of V in each region, and check that it yields the correct field. Sketch V(r).
Answer:
Uniformly Charged Solid Sphere — Part 1: Field \( \mathbf E(r) \) via Gauss
Total charge \(q\), radius \(R\), uniform density \(\rho=\dfrac{3q}{4\pi R^3}\). Let \(k=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\).
Symmetry. The field is radial: \(\mathbf E(r)=E(r)\,\hat{\mathbf r}\).
Gauss’s law.
Step 1 — Choose surface. Spherical Gaussian surface of radius \(r\):
\[ \oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{a} \;=\; E(r)\,4\pi r^{2} \]Step 2 — Enclosed charge.
\[ Q_{\mathrm{enc}}(r) = \frac{4\pi\rho}{3}\, r^{3} = q\left(\frac{r^{3}}{R^{3}}\right) \quad (0 \le r < R) \] \[ Q_{\mathrm{enc}}(r) = q \quad (r \ge R) \]Step 3 — Solve for \(E(r)\).
\[ E(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{Q_{\mathrm{enc}}(r)}{r^{2}} \] \[ E(r) = \begin{cases} k\,\dfrac{q\,r}{R^{3}}, & 0 \le r < R, \\[6pt] k\,\dfrac{q}{r^{2}}, & r \ge R \end{cases} \]Direction: \(\mathbf E(r)=E(r)\,\hat{\mathbf r}\) (outward for \(q>0\)).
Potential V(r) with V(∞)=0
The potential is defined by \[ V(r) = -\int_{\infty}^{r} \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l} = \int_{r}^{\infty} E(s)\,ds \] Outside the sphere \((r \ge R)\): \[ V_{\text{out}}(r) = \int_{r}^{\infty} k\,\frac{q}{s^{2}}\,ds = \left[-\,k\,\frac{q}{s}\right]_{r}^{\infty} = k\,\frac{q}{r} \] Inside the sphere \((r < R)\): \[ \begin{aligned} V_{\text{in}}(r) &= \int_{R}^{\infty} k\,\frac{q}{s^{2}}\,ds + \int_{r}^{R} k\,\frac{q\,s}{R^{3}}\,ds \\[6pt] &= \frac{kq}{R} + kq\,\frac{R^{2}-r^{2}}{2R^{3}} \\[6pt] &= k\,\frac{q}{2R}\left(3 - \frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}\right) \end{aligned} \] Checks: \[ V_{\text{in}}(R) = V_{\text{out}}(R) = \frac{kq}{R}, \qquad V(0) = \tfrac{3}{2}\,\frac{kq}{R}. \]Gradient check: E = −∇V
Spherical symmetry implies \[ \nabla V = \frac{dV}{dr}\,\hat{\mathbf r}. \] Outside (r ≥ R), with \( V_{\text{out}}(r) = k\,\dfrac{q}{r} \): \[ \frac{dV_{\text{out}}}{dr} = -\,k\,\frac{q}{r^{2}} \] \[ -\nabla V_{\text{out}} = k\,\frac{q}{r^{2}}\,\hat{\mathbf r} = \mathbf E_{\text{out}}(r). \] Inside (0 ≤ r < R), with \( V_{\text{in}}(r) = k\,\dfrac{q}{2R}\!\left(3-\dfrac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}\right) \): \[ \frac{dV_{\text{in}}}{dr} = -\,k\,\frac{q\,r}{R^{3}} \] \[ -\nabla V_{\text{in}} = k\,\frac{q\,r}{R^{3}}\,\hat{\mathbf r} = \mathbf E_{\text{in}}(r). \] Continuity of the field at \( r=R \): \[ \mathbf E_{\text{in}}(R)=k\,\frac{q}{R^{2}}\,\hat{\mathbf r} \;=\; \mathbf E_{\text{out}}(R). \]Final compact results
Define \( k = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \). Potential: \[ V_{\text{in}}(r) = k\,\frac{q}{2R}\left(3 - \frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}\right) \quad (0 \le r < R) \] \[ V_{\text{out}}(r) = k\,\frac{q}{r} \quad (r \ge R) \] Electric field (radial, outward for \(q>0\)): \[ \mathbf E_{\text{in}}(r) = k\,\frac{q\,r}{R^{3}}\,\hat{\mathbf r} \quad (0 \le r < R) \] \[ \mathbf E_{\text{out}}(r) = k\,\frac{q}{r^{2}}\,\hat{\mathbf r} \quad (r \ge R) \] Continuity checks: \[ V_{\text{in}}(R) = V_{\text{out}}(R) = \frac{kq}{R}, \qquad \mathbf E_{\text{in}}(R) = \mathbf E_{\text{out}}(R) = \frac{kq}{R^{2}}\,\hat{\mathbf r}. \]Sketch of V(r)
Inside the sphere (0 ≤ r < R), \(V(r)\) is a downward-opening parabola. Outside (r ≥ R), it falls as \(1/r\). They join smoothly at \(r=R\).
P2.25
For the potential a distance s from an infinitely long straight wire that carries a uniform line charge λ. Compute the gradient of your potential, and check that it yields the correct field.
Answer:
Potential of an Infinite Line Charge and Gradient Check
The wire is infinitely long, with uniform line charge density \( \lambda \). Cylindrical symmetry implies the electric field is radial: \( \mathbf E(s)=E(s)\,\hat{\mathbf s} \). Using Gauss’s law on a coaxial cylinder of radius \(s\) and length \(L\), \[ E(s)\,(2\pi s L)=\frac{\lambda L}{\varepsilon_0}\quad\Rightarrow\quad E(s)=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0\,s}. \] Since \(V(\infty)\) is not finite for a line charge, we choose a finite reference radius \(s_0\) with \(V(s_0)=0\). Then \[ V(s)=-\int_{s_0}^{s}\mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf l =-\int_{s_0}^{s}\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0\,s'}\,ds' =-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\!\left(\frac{s}{s_0}\right) = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\!\left(\frac{s_0}{s}\right). \]Gradient (check \( \mathbf E = -\nabla V \))
In cylindrical symmetry, \( \nabla V = \dfrac{dV}{ds}\,\hat{\mathbf s} \). Differentiate: \[ \frac{dV}{ds} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{d}{ds}\!\left[\ln\!\left(\frac{s_0}{s}\right)\right] = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\left( -\frac{1}{s} \right). \] Therefore \[ -\nabla V = -\frac{dV}{ds}\,\hat{\mathbf s} = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0\,s}\,\hat{\mathbf s} = \mathbf E(s), \] which matches the Gauss-law field.Final expressions
\[ V(s)=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\!\left(\frac{s_0}{s}\right), \qquad \mathbf E(s)=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0\,s}\,\hat{\mathbf s}. \] Reference note: \(s_0\) is an arbitrary constant radius that fixes the zero of potential; changing \(s_0\) adds a global constant to \(V\) but leaves \(\mathbf E\) unchanged.
P2.29
Use Eq.2.29 to calculate the potential inside a uniformly charged solid sphere of radius R and total charge q.
Answer:
Potential inside a uniformly charged solid sphere (radius \(R\), total charge \(q\))
Volume charge density: \[ \rho=\frac{3q}{4\pi R^{3}},\qquad \Phi(\infty)=0. \]
Outside (for context): \[ \Phi(r\!\ge\!R)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{q}{r}. \]
Inside (\(0\le r
\[ \boxed{\; \Phi(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{q}{2R}\left(3-\frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}\right) \;} \] Derivation (using the Poisson/Green’s result) The electric field inside a uniformly charged sphere is \[ E(r)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{r}{R^{3}} \quad (\text{radially outward}). \] With \(\Phi(\infty)=0\), the surface potential is \(\Phi(R)=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q}{R}\).
Then integrate inward: \[ \Phi(r)=\Phi(R)-\int_{R}^{r} E(r')\,dr' =\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{q}{R} -\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 R^{3}}\int_{R}^{r} r'\,dr' =\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{q}{2R}\!\left(3-\frac{r^{2}}{R^{2}}\right). \]
Check: \[ -\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{r}{R^{3}}=E(r), \] and continuity at \(r=R\) gives \(\Phi(R)=\dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 R}\).
P2.32
(a) Three charges are situated at the corners of a square (side length a). How much work does it take to bring in another charge, +q, from far away and place it in the fourth corner?
(b) How much work does it take to assemble the entire configuration of four charges?Answer:
(a) Work to bring a \(+q\) from infinity to corner \(B\)
Let the square have side length \(a\). Place charges at corners: \(A(0,0)=-q\), \(C(a,a)=-q\) (the two \(-q\) are diagonal/farthest apart), \(D(0,a)=+q\). We bring \(+q\) to \(B(a,0)\).
The potential at \(B\) due to the existing three charges is \[ V(B)=k\,\Bigg(\frac{-q}{a}+\frac{+q}{\sqrt{2}\,a}+\frac{-q}{a}\Bigg) = k\,\frac{q}{a}\,\Big(-2+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big), \] where \(k=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\).
Work (by an external agent, quasistatically): \[ W_{\text{(a)}}=q\,V(B) = k\,\frac{q^{2}}{a}\,\Big(-2+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big). \]
Numerically, \(-2+1/\sqrt{2}\approx -1.2929\), so the work is negative: the field does net positive work (you’d have to extract energy to hold the approach slow).
(b) Work to assemble the full four-charge configuration
This equals the total electrostatic potential energy (sum over all distinct pairs):
- Sides (distance \(a\)): \(AB,\,BC,\,CD,\,DA\) each contribute \(-\,k\,\dfrac{q^{2}}{a}\) \(\Rightarrow\) total \(-4\,k\,\dfrac{q^{2}}{a}\).
- Diagonals (distance \(\sqrt{2}\,a\)): \(AC\) (like charges \(-q,-q\)) and \(BD\) (like charges \(+q,+q\)) each contribute \(+\,k\,\dfrac{q^{2}}{\sqrt{2}\,a}\) \(\Rightarrow\) total \(+\,2k\,\dfrac{q^{2}}{\sqrt{2}\,a}=k\,\dfrac{\sqrt{2}\,q^{2}}{a}\).
Total: \[ U_{\text{total}} = k\,\frac{q^{2}}{a}\,(\sqrt{2}-4). \]
Check: Adding the last \(+q\) at \(B\) in (a) changes energy by its interactions with \(A, C, D\): \(-\frac{q^{2}}{a}-\frac{q^{2}}{a}+\frac{q^{2}}{\sqrt{2}a} = \frac{q^{2}}{a}\Big(-2+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big)\), matching \(W_{\text{(a)}}\).
P2.33
Two positive point charges, qa and qb (masses ma and mb) are at rest, held together by a massless string of length a. Now the string is cut, and the particles fly off in opposite directions. How fast is each going, when they are far apart?
Answer:
Conservation of energy Conservation of momentumInitially the charges \(q_a>0\) and \(q_b>0\) are at rest, separated by \(a\), held by a massless string. The initial potential energy is
\[ U_i = k\,\frac{q_a q_b}{a},\qquad k=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}. \]
After the string is cut and the charges are very far apart, their potential energy \(\to 0\) and they move apart with speeds \(v_a\) and \(v_b\) in opposite directions.
Equations
\[ \text{Energy: }\quad \tfrac12 m_a v_a^2 + \tfrac12 m_b v_b^2 \;=\; k\,\frac{q_a q_b}{a}. \]
\[ \text{Momentum: }\quad m_a v_a = m_b v_b \quad (\text{equal and opposite}). \]
Solution (explicit speeds)
From momentum, \(v_a = \dfrac{m_b}{m_a} \, v_b\). Substitute into energy to get
\[ \frac12\,m_b v_b^2\!\left(1+\frac{m_b}{m_a}\right) \;=\; k\,\frac{q_a q_b}{a}. \]
Therefore
\[ v_b \;=\; \sqrt{\;\frac{2k\,q_a q_b}{a}\;\frac{m_a}{m_b\,(m_a+m_b)}\;},\qquad v_a \;=\; \frac{m_b}{m_a}\,v_b \;=\; \sqrt{\;\frac{2k\,q_a q_b}{a}\;\frac{m_b}{m_a\,(m_a+m_b)}\;}. \]
Compact form (using reduced mass)
Let the reduced mass be \(\mu=\dfrac{m_a m_b}{m_a+m_b}\). The final common momentum magnitude is
\[ p \;=\; \sqrt{2\,\mu\,k\,\frac{q_a q_b}{a}}\,,\quad v_a=\frac{p}{m_a},\;\; v_b=\frac{p}{m_b}. \]
Sanity checks: If \(m_a\!\gg\! m_b\), then \(v_a\to 0\) and \(v_b\to \sqrt{2k q_a q_b/(a\,m_b)}\) as expected. If \(m_a=m_b\), then \(v_a=v_b=\sqrt{k q_a q_b /(a m_a)}\).
P2.36
Here is a fourth way of computing the energy of a uniform charged solid sphere (you might call it the method of assembly): Build it up like a snowball, layer by layer, each time bringing an infinitesimal charge dq from far away and smearing it uniformly over the surface, thereby increasing the radius. How much work dW does it take to advance the radius from r to r+dr? Integrate your result to find the work necessary to create the entire sphere of radius R and total charge q.
Answer:
Method of assembly (snowball) Spherical symmetryGoal. Compute the self-energy \(U\) of a uniformly charged solid sphere of total charge \(q\), radius \(R\), by assembling it shell by shell from infinity.
Setup
- Uniform volume charge density: \(\displaystyle \rho=\frac{q}{\tfrac{4}{3}\pi R^{3}}=\frac{3q}{4\pi R^{3}}\).
- At intermediate radius \(r\) (\(0\le r\le R\)), the charge already present is \(\displaystyle Q(r)=\rho\,\frac{4}{3}\pi r^{3}\).
- We add a thin shell of thickness \(\mathrm{d}r\): \(\displaystyle \mathrm{d}q=\rho\,4\pi r^{2}\,\mathrm{d}r.\)
- By spherical symmetry, the potential at the surface \(r\) due to the interior charge is \(\displaystyle V(r)=k\,\frac{Q(r)}{r}\), with \(k=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\).
Incremental work
\[ \mathrm{d}W=V(r)\,\mathrm{d}q = k\,\frac{Q(r)}{r}\,\mathrm{d}q = k\,\frac{\rho\,\tfrac{4}{3}\pi r^{3}}{r}\,\big(\rho\,4\pi r^{2}\,\mathrm{d}r\big) = k\,\frac{16}{3}\pi^{2}\rho^{2}\,r^{4}\,\mathrm{d}r. \]
Integrate from \(0\) to \(R\)
Insert \(\rho=\dfrac{3q}{4\pi R^{3}}\): \(\rho^{2}=\dfrac{9q^{2}}{16\pi^{2}R^{6}}\).
\[ \mathrm{d}W = k\,\frac{16}{3}\pi^{2}\left(\frac{9q^{2}}{16\pi^{2}R^{6}}\right) r^{4}\,\mathrm{d}r = k\,\frac{3q^{2}}{R^{6}}\,r^{4}\,\mathrm{d}r. \]
\[ U=\int_{0}^{R}\mathrm{d}W = k\,\frac{3q^{2}}{R^{6}}\int_{0}^{R} r^{4}\,\mathrm{d}r = k\,\frac{3q^{2}}{R^{6}}\cdot \frac{R^{5}}{5} = \boxed{\,\frac{3}{5}\,k\,\frac{q^{2}}{R}\,}\,. \]
Summary
At assembly step \(r\to r+\mathrm{d}r\): \(\displaystyle \mathrm{d}W = k\,\frac{3q^{2}}{R^{6}}\,r^{4}\,\mathrm{d}r.\) The total work (self-energy) to build the sphere is \(\displaystyle U=\frac{3}{5}\,\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\frac{q^{2}}{R}\). Dimensions check: \(U\sim k q^2/R\) as expected; scales like \(q^2\) and \(1/R\).
P2.39
A metal sphere of radius R, carrying charge q, is surrounded by a thick concentric metal shell(inner radius a, outer radius b) The shell carries no net charge.
a) Find the surface charge density at R, at a, and at b.
b) Find the potential at the center, using infinity as the reference point.
c) Now the outer surface is touched by a grounding wire, which drains the off charge and lowers it's potential to zero. How does the the surface charge density, and the potential at the center change?Answer:
Gauss’s law Conductors in electrostatic equilibrium SuperpositionSetup. A solid metal sphere of radius \(R\) carries total charge \(q\). A concentric thick metal shell has inner radius \(a\) and outer radius \(b\) (\(Rnet charge is zero.
(a) Surface charge densities on \(r=R,\,a,\,b\)
- All charge on the solid sphere resides on its surface: \(Q_R=+q \Rightarrow \displaystyle \sigma(R)=\frac{q}{4\pi R^2}\).
- Field inside the metal of the shell must vanish. A Gaussian sphere just inside the shell (with radius between \(a\) and \(b\)) encloses \(q + Q_a\). For \(E=0\) in the metal, \(q+Q_a=0\Rightarrow Q_a=-q\), so \(\displaystyle \sigma(a)=\frac{-q}{4\pi a^2}\).
- Since the shell is neutral, \(Q_b=-(Q_a)=+q\), so \(\displaystyle \sigma(b)=\frac{+q}{4\pi b^2}\).
(b) Potential at the center \(V(0)\) with \(V(\infty)=0\)
Each charged spherical surface contributes a constant potential inside it: a shell of radius \(s\) and charge \(Q\) gives \(kQ/s\) everywhere at \(r\le s\), where \(k=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\).
\[ V(0)=k\!\left(\frac{q}{R}+\frac{-q}{a}+\frac{+q}{b}\right) = k\,q\!\left(\frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}\right). \]
(c) Outer surface is grounded (touched by a wire)
Grounding forces the entire shell (the conductor) to be at zero potential. The charge on the inner surface is still fixed by Gauss’s law:
- \(Q_a=-q\) (unchanged) \(\Rightarrow \displaystyle \sigma(a)=\frac{-q}{4\pi a^2}\).
- Let the outer surface carry \(Q_b'\). Continuity of potential at \(r=a\) and \(V_{\text{shell}}=0\) implies \(\;V(a)=k\!\left(\frac{q}{a}+\frac{Q_a}{a}+\frac{Q_b'}{b}\right)=k\!\left(\frac{q}{a}-\frac{q}{a}+\frac{Q_b'}{b}\right)=k\,\frac{Q_b'}{b}=0\), hence \(Q_b'=0\). Therefore \(\displaystyle \sigma(b)=0\) after grounding.
Updated center potential.
\[ V_{\text{grounded}}(0)=k\!\left(\frac{q}{R}+\frac{-q}{a}+0\right) = k\,q\!\left(\frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{a}\right). \]
Summary: Before grounding: \(\;\sigma(R)=\dfrac{q}{4\pi R^2},\;\sigma(a)=\dfrac{-q}{4\pi a^2},\;\sigma(b)=\dfrac{q}{4\pi b^2},\; V(0)=k\,q\!\left(\dfrac{1}{R}-\dfrac{1}{a}+\dfrac{1}{b}\right)\). After grounding the outer surface: \(\;\sigma(R)=\dfrac{q}{4\pi R^2}\) (unchanged), \(\;\sigma(a)=\dfrac{-q}{4\pi a^2}\) (unchanged), \(\;\sigma(b)=0\), \(\;V(0)=k\,q\!\left(\dfrac{1}{R}-\dfrac{1}{a}\right)\). The center potential drops by \(kq/b\).
P2.44
Find the capacitance per unit length of two coaxial metal cylindrical tubes, of radii a and b.
Answer:
Gauss’s law Cylindrical symmetryGoal. Two long coaxial metal tubes of radii \(a
Field between the cylinders
Let the inner tube carry \(+\lambda\) and the outer carry \(-\lambda\) (charge per unit length). Apply Gauss’s law to a coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius \(r\) with length \(\ell\) where \(a
\[ \oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{A} = E(2\pi r \,\ell) = \frac{\lambda \,\ell}{\varepsilon_0} \;\;\Rightarrow\;\; E(r)=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0\, r}. \]
Potential difference
Take \(V(a)-V(b)=\displaystyle \int_a^b E(r)\,dr\) (radially outward):
\[ V \equiv V(a)-V(b) \;=\; \int_a^b \frac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0\, r}\,dr \;=\; \frac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\,\ln\!\frac{b}{a}. \]
Capacitance per unit length
By definition \(C'=\dfrac{\text{charge per unit length}}{\text{potential difference}}=\dfrac{\lambda}{V}\):
\[ \boxed{\,C'=\frac{2\pi \varepsilon_0}{\ln(b/a)}\,}\quad\text{[F/m]}. \]
With dielectric: If the region \(a
P2.53
Two Infinitely long wires running parallel to the x-axis carrying uniform charge density +λ and -λ.
a)Find the potential at any point (x, y, z), using the origin as your reference.
b)Show that the equipotential surfaces are circular cylinders, and locate the axis and radius of the cylinder corresponding to a given potential Vo.Answer:
Line-charge potential Superposition Apollonius circlesGeometry. Two infinite wires are parallel to the \(x\)-axis. In the cross-sectional \((y,z)\) plane, place \(+\lambda\) at \((y,z)=(+d/2,0)\) and \( -\lambda\) at \((y,z)=(-d/2,0)\). The origin is midway, so \(V(\mathbf{0})=0\) will naturally hold.
(a) Potential \(V(x,y,z)\) with the origin as reference
The potential of a line charge of density \(+\lambda\) at transverse distance \(r\) is \(V\propto \ln r\) (up to a constant). By superposition, letting \(r_+ = \sqrt{(y-d/2)^2+z^2}\) and \(r_- = \sqrt{(y+d/2)^2+z^2}\), one convenient gauge is
\[ V(x,y,z) \;=\; \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\ln\!\frac{r_-}{r_+} \;=\; \frac{\lambda}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \ln\!\frac{(y+\tfrac{d}{2})^2+z^2}{(y-\tfrac{d}{2})^2+z^2}\,. \]
At the origin \(r_+=r_-=\tfrac{d}{2}\Rightarrow V(0,0,0)=0\), so the origin is indeed the reference.
(b) Equipotentials are circular cylinders; axis and radius for a given \(V_0\)
Set \(V(x,y,z)=V_0\). Define \(\displaystyle \kappa \equiv \exp\!\big(\tfrac{2\pi\varepsilon_0}{\lambda}V_0\big)\). Then the equipotential condition is \( \dfrac{r_-}{r_+}=\kappa\). Squaring and using \(r_\pm^2=(y\mp \tfrac{d}{2})^2+z^2\) gives
\[ (y+\tfrac{d}{2})^2+z^2 = \kappa^2\big[(y-\tfrac{d}{2})^2+z^2\big]. \]
Rearrange to the standard circle form \((y-y_c)^2+z^2=\rho^2\) (independent of \(x\)), with
\[ y_c \;=\; -\,\frac{d}{2}\,\frac{1+\kappa^2}{\,1-\kappa^2\,}, \qquad \rho \;=\; \frac{d\,|\kappa|}{\,|1-\kappa^2|\,}. \]
Thus each equipotential is a circular cylinder whose axis is the line \( \{(x,y,z):\, y=y_c,\; z=0,\; x\in\mathbb{R}\} \) (parallel to the \(x\)-axis), with radius \(\rho\) given above. The special case \(V_0=0\Rightarrow \kappa=1\) reduces to the plane \(y=0\) (the perpendicular bisector), which you can regard as the \(\rho\to\infty\) limit.
Sanity checks: Near the \(+\lambda\) wire, \(r_+\ll r_-\Rightarrow V>0\). Swapping the wire labels flips \(V\to -V\) and reflects the equipotential circles across \(y=0\), as expected by symmetry.
P2.60
Prove or disprove(with counter example) the following :
Theorem: Suppose a conductor carrying a net charge Q, when placed in an external electric field Ee, experiences a force F; if the external filed is now (Ee -> -Ee), the force also reverses (F -> -F)
What if we stipulate that the external field is uniform?Answer:
Force on a charge distribution Multipole expansion CounterexampleClaim
Theorem (to test). A conductor carrying net charge \(Q\) in an external electrostatic field \(\mathbf E_e\) experiences force \(\mathbf F\). If the external field is reversed \((\mathbf E_e \to -\mathbf E_e)\), then \(\mathbf F \to -\mathbf F\).
General framework
The (electrostatic) force on any rigid charge distribution is \[ \mathbf F \;=\; \int \rho(\mathbf r)\,\mathbf E_e(\mathbf r)\,d^3r, \] where \(\mathbf E_e\) is the field due to external sources (self-field doesn’t contribute to net force). Expand \(\mathbf E_e\) about some point \(\mathbf r_0\) (e.g. the body’s center): \[ \mathbf E_e(\mathbf r) \approx \mathbf E_0 + (\mathbf r-\mathbf r_0)\!\cdot\!\nabla\mathbf E_0 + \cdots. \] This yields the standard multipole form \[ \mathbf F \;\approx\; Q\,\mathbf E_0 \;+\; (\mathbf p\!\cdot\!\nabla)\mathbf E_0 \;+\; \tfrac{1}{6}\,\mathbf Q^{(2)}\!:\!\nabla\nabla \mathbf E_0 \;+\;\cdots, \] where \(Q\) is total charge, \(\mathbf p\) is the dipole moment, and \(\mathbf Q^{(2)}\) the quadrupole tensor.
Why the theorem is false in general
For a conductor, \(\mathbf p\) and higher moments are induced by the local field. In the linear regime, \(\mathbf p = \boldsymbol{\alpha}\,\mathbf E_0\) (polarizability tensor; for a small conducting sphere \(\alpha = 4\pi\varepsilon_0 a^3\)). Then \[ \mathbf F \;\approx\; Q\,\mathbf E_0 \;+\; (\mathbf p\!\cdot\!\nabla)\mathbf E_0 \;=\; Q\,\mathbf E_0 \;+\; \frac{\alpha}{2}\,\nabla\!\big(\mathbf E_0^2\big)\quad(\nabla\times\mathbf E_0=0). \] If we flip the external field, \(\mathbf E_0\to-\mathbf E_0\), the first term changes sign (as \(Q\,\mathbf E_0\to -Q\,\mathbf E_0\)), but the second term does not: \[ \frac{\alpha}{2}\,\nabla\!\big((-\mathbf E_0)^2\big)=\frac{\alpha}{2}\,\nabla\!\big(\mathbf E_0^2\big). \] Hence the total force does not, in general, reverse sign.
Concrete counterexample (non-uniform field)
Place a neutral conducting sphere (\(Q=0\), radius \(a\)) in the non-uniform field of a distant point charge \(q_e\). The induced dipole \(\mathbf p=\alpha\,\mathbf E\) yields the dielectrophoretic force \[ \mathbf F \;=\; \frac{\alpha}{2}\,\nabla\!\big(E^2\big) \;=\; 2\pi \varepsilon_0 a^3\,\nabla\!\big(E^2\big), \quad \alpha=4\pi\varepsilon_0 a^3. \] Along the line to the point charge, \(E(R)=k|q_e|/R^2\) so \(E^2\propto 1/R^4\) and \(\nabla(E^2)\) points toward the charge. Changing \(q_e\to -q_e\) reverses \(\mathbf E\) but leaves \(E^2\) (and thus \(\mathbf F\)) unchanged: the conductor is attracted toward the stronger-field region either way. This violates “\(\mathbf F\to -\mathbf F\)”. Therefore, the theorem is false in general.
What if the external field is uniform?
- Uniform field \(\Rightarrow \nabla \mathbf E_0=\mathbf 0\). All gradient-dependent terms vanish, so \[ \boxed{\ \mathbf F = Q\,\mathbf E_0\ }. \] Flipping the field gives \(\mathbf F\to -\mathbf F\). The theorem holds in this special case.
- If \(Q=0\) and the field is uniform, then \(\mathbf F=\mathbf 0\) (a conductor can feel a torque in some shapes, but no net force).
Summary
Disproved (in general): In non-uniform fields, induced-dipole (and higher-multipole) forces contain \(\nabla(E^2)\)–type contributions that are unchanged when \(\mathbf E\) is reversed; the net force need not flip. True (uniform field): If the external field is uniform, \(\mathbf F=Q\mathbf E\) and reversing \(\mathbf E\) reverses \(\mathbf F\).
Useful mental model: “Uniform field → only total charge matters.” “Non-uniform field → the field gradients matter, and induced moments break the simple sign-flip rule.”
